tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-73895970001235302692024-02-07T00:22:36.639-05:00Script In HandA Sherlockian comic book fan, former actor, moves to NYC to pursue a career in publishing.
This is where he writes about whatever comes into his mind.Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.comBlogger517125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-90436205000722283132012-04-06T17:18:00.001-04:002012-04-06T17:18:24.957-04:00Okay... So...Okay, so addressing some of the comments that have been made on my previous post, I wanted to take a quick minute to update the readership about what is going on for this blog, and what's been going on for me in general.<br />
<br />
Since I last posted in November (sheesh!), I have been busy working at a major publishing house. I still work in e-book production, and I'm getting my fingers into all sorts of aspects of digital publishing - high-design cookbooks, novels, children's book, a little of the future technology keeps crossing my desk now and then...<br />
<br />
But because of the (wonderful) amount of time I spend on my job and on tasks related to it, my independent producing has fallen by the wayside. As it is likely to do, I imagine. But the lack of these things in my life left me feeling a little confused about what to do with this blog. I tried for a while to make it a place for reviews, but that wasn't quite the most satisfying thing for me to be doing. And I said it would be a place for my rants, but that didn't seem right either. Besides, the name of this blog was "Script in Hand" and related specifically to acting and producing, so was it the right place to post reviews of things? But with no acting and very little producing, I didn't want to take to this blog and talk about all the projects I <i>might</i> be working on, or things I <i>wanted</i> to do. That didn't seem like good reading, either.<br />
<br />
All of these were the questions I was dealing with (albeit lazily), so I'm not sure what this blog will be in the future. It might still feature the adventures in the non-professional acting and producing trade, or it might venture into new territory. I also think it may officially end, and I might start an entirely new blog with a new focus on reviews, rants, observations, etc.<br />
<br />
So while I said I'm back... I'm not back. I am still around, and I am still wrestling with what SIH should be. When I have an idea, I'll be back. But until then, just as with the RHP podcast, please consider this an indefinite extended hiatus.Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-66367530188405810702011-11-14T21:25:00.001-05:002011-11-14T21:37:38.250-05:00We're Back, Baby!Okay, I know I was away for almost two months. But those two months have been very busy for me. I'm getting my life in order up here in NYC, working in the e-book division for a major book publishing house. But don't worry, I've been collecting comics, watching TV, going to the movies, reading books, and having many loud opinions about things that very few people care about. Opinions that I've been dying to share, but no one is interested in hearing me rant.<br />
<br />
Then I remembered I had a blog!<br />
<br />
So this is it! We're back! I'm back!Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-36845640607264825962011-09-24T18:00:00.000-04:002011-09-24T19:02:13.957-04:00EchoesI'm sorry, actor-friends. You might not like this entry. For you see, something happened to me a few weeks ago that would have been cause for celebration if I were still an actor in Philadelphia. But in my new career in NYC publishing, the email was a non-issue.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I got an email and a phone call from a casting associate at one of the larger Philly theatres, asking if I was interested in being an understudy for an upcoming show that would open their season. This was on a Friday, and I even got a follow-up call on the next Monday before I could sneak out of the office to give a call back with my answer, saying that I was no longer in Philadelphia and could not be considered for the opportunity. He thanked me for an answer, and (I assume) went to call the next person on his list. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
My casual attitude toward the whole thing surprised me a little. Such an offer would be a relatively huge deal in the Philly theatre scene, the chance to get my food in the door and make connections at one of the big theatres. Since all of life is networking, the foot in the door could lead to larger roles, union membership, and eventually the prospect of continuous work. A year ago this would have been cause for celebration.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
But as casually as I may have rejected the offer, I found that I did not have the heart (or guts) to tell them that I had quit acting. I've been feeling the lure of the stage lately, and I want to find a way to get involved with that side of me again. I want to find a project that seems like fun. There are a few prospects coming up, actually, so I might be coming back to performing, since I couldn't break the link completely. But I don't think that's a bad thing - acting is a big part of my life, and I'm excited to re-integrate it back into my life in NYC. However and whenever it happens. Til then, I'll be at my desk.</div>
Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-46123045197003292532011-09-21T23:38:00.000-04:002011-09-22T16:47:58.692-04:00Justice League #1Justice League #1<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6OtRZyTmKAi5HtQTj0-rAtVEzlmCLLPcUGrUarXV3k9g3MCxoqB4AioApOYjanTqNWvM_dDTpbahnG_h0Exx4zwj2LPQaRUzdJCKlVeJ0Z2KTxOJ4JFEcyNPbh_psl4HHvyk09PdxlVc/s200/JusticeLeague_1.jpg" style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 122px; height: 200px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647231144965311874" /><div>Geoff Johns, writer & Jim Lee, artist</div><div>DC Comics</div><div><br /></div><div>The big event is here, and the new DCUniverse has now hit the shelves. I picked it up and I flipped through it a few times before I sat down to read it. And I read it a few times before writing these comments. I wanted to love it. I went into this whole reboot with my arms wide open, but the book didn't make it easy for me.</div><div><br /></div><div>Don't get me wrong: there are things to like here. There are things not to like here. But ultimately, the issue falls squarely in the middle of both. It's not just average, it's aggressively average, as if Johns and Lee came out and said "Let's make the safest, best, safest, most dynamic, safest, and safest comic that we can." And, as far as I'm concerned, they hit that mediocre nail right on the head.</div><div><br /></div><div>Things to like:</div><div><ul><li><b>First meetings.</b> It's always fun to see characters meet each other for the "first" time. Green Lantern doesn't believe Batman is real, Batman deduces the source of GL's powers, and none of them have any idea what Superman is all about.</li><li><b>Mystery plotline.</b> There is a little mystery developing about who is behind the attacks that Batman is investigating. Of course the ultimate answer is revealed to the audience (although the heroes don't recognize the bad guy's name), it seems that Johns might be setting up a mystery among the fist-pounding heroics.</li><li><b>Final splash.</b> The final splash page is excellent. Sure it sets up a scene that we've seen thousands and thousands of times in the last six years of comics, but it's a great page. I'd hang the poster on my wall.</li></ul></div><div>Things not to like:</div><div><ul><li><b>Set-ups.</b> And nothing but set-ups. The whole book is setting up a long story arc that will play out over the next six months, if not longer. And this is the first part of that story, so characters and plot points are being set-up for the future. As a result, not a whole lot happens that doesn't make me wish I had the next issue (or the trade) in my hands so I could keep reading.</li><li><b>Most of Jim Lee's art.</b> Jim Lee has great character designs, and I might be screamed at by the comics community for saying this, but: I don't care for his art in this issue. It's all a little busy, a little hyper, and more than a little unclear. His characters always look great, but sometimes it's hard to tell what they are doing. But the Green Lantern constructs are fun, as is a single panel of GL half-changing back to Hal Jordan. And I already mentioned that <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aeZ3Rv9_-6s/TmEuzB-J6wI/AAAAAAAAFmY/8vxZHGp4uCQ/s640/JL_1_Oroboros_CPS_036.jpg">final splash</a>.</li><li><b>(Too) Familiar ground.</b> A friend of mine mentioned this to me, and my next read really brought it out for me. This book relies on my previous knowledge of the DC Universe, as much as Johns and Lee want to pretend it's a fresh start for new readers. It's not. It's actually a terrible way to introduce characters we've never met before (like my experience with Vic Stone), but it's a standard way to introduce characters we haven't seen in a while (think: <i>Casino Royale </i>or <i>Batman Begins)</i>. I can't help but feel that the issue's content is not well-matched to the relaunch's intention.</li></ul><div>Things in the middle:</div><div><ul><li><b>Everything else. </b>Okay, maybe that's a little snarky, but seriously, there weren't many things that stood out about this book, either good or bad. A lot of it felt very... functional.</li></ul></div></div><div>Ultimately, it's a solid issue. Is it exciting enough that I'll pick up the next one? Sure, I guess... And that's the biggest problem. I wanted that answer to be a resounding "HELL YES!" but it isn't. At the moment, I'm committing myself to the first story arc. But if it keeps going like this, I'll have to play it by ear for the second. Good? Yes. Great? No.</div><div><br /></div><div>NEXT TIME: Superman in "Action Comics #1..."</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-9412948132939169592011-08-31T22:06:00.008-04:002011-08-31T23:53:51.280-04:00Thoughts on the DCnU<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq5PPgTiqxMLRtHX_cnxAonMwzeOkyj4OPxAAMMg4lVMxatCQ7_6xThZdhBnBzEKi2IJ4-zdRB1fF4XT05M97FnDrYjquwfIHTHPWIGYQqb8QOOy3Riq6DT7VwFQ7ZfhTeZJQiE-RP9zE/s200/promo.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647228625677029506" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 200px; height: 107px; " /><div style="text-align: left;">Sitting on the couch next to me is a signed copy of Justice League #1, the first comic book released by DC Comics as a part of their company-wide relaunch. If you haven't heard, DC has completely re-branded their line of comic books, starting every series over with a new #1 issue. Many characters (Superman included) are getting an all-new backstory, history, costume, everything. They are hoping to reinvigorate their comics, as well as grab new readers. And in <a href="http://scriptinhand.blogspot.com/2011/05/open-letter-to-dc-comics.html">a post in May</a>, I laid out the circumstances that would bring me back to monthly comics. In that post, I challenged DC to put out something that I wanted to buy, and now they have. So I am there. I subscribed to my books today at my local LCS.</div><div>
<br /></div><div>And now, with the first step of the DCnU in my hands but still unread, I'm still excited. Are there some press releases that make me nervous? Yes. Do I think I might be switching to the trade paperbacks in a year? Maybe. But do I think they have "ruined" Superman with this move? Not at all. Comics are a fluid medium, and the Superman from two years ago bears almost no resemblance to the Superman from the 1940s. So the changes don't really scare me. I'm ready for them. Hell, I'll even buy the action figure! (That costume is growing on me...)</div><div>
<br /></div><div>What I'm worried about are the stories. If they are good stories, well-told and captivating, then I will be a part of the series. If the stories aren't compelling, then this will seem like a publicity stunt to attract attention. If the writers and creators use this opportunity to capture a new spirit of adventure, it will be perfect. But with Geoff Johns involved, I'm afraid that the "new" universe is going to be largely derivative of the old one. But if these stories and books keep the feel of the characters while giving them a whole new coat of paint, I'm in. To me, at this point in DC history, the worst thing for these books would be if they merely recycle the old material and try to pass it off as something new.</div><div>
<br /></div><div>Well, time to break the book out and see which way the nU goes....</div><div>
<br /></div><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1IKwBj9b59vFUJNc5d5KQ-7SrXYyp3d1l5_1ryxTIuSv5ct2UR7ZEtZDrCeJtTOQMXi1mARYaEgI_dyxNBWlo4t568Oih1m3cU3sjuiMclU4QvjR-HMky2OCGhOGm4ZshcbceVzwZVUk/s400/DCN52_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5647228308478958914" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: auto; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 308px; height: 400px; " />Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-48615975617143791972011-08-21T15:00:00.002-04:002011-08-21T15:29:59.389-04:00Carte Blanche: The new James Bond novel<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4N3N2ddR47EvPrxL-ICg97iZX_ddT59lXHVTs7KQtOF1hasGkKTBsnQ8zyeg3dxyLk0Ru3vokZDTk-zlmTFV0TTvFNofTLkGVwvKFcm8IrFOlqUf_VZr1pypxadJHG7pMaMPgUqhHzNo/s1600/Carte_Blanche_Jeffery_Deaver_James_Bond_continuation_novel_007_cover_US_Simon_and_Schuster_1st_American_Edition_first_dust_jacket.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 131px; height: 200px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4N3N2ddR47EvPrxL-ICg97iZX_ddT59lXHVTs7KQtOF1hasGkKTBsnQ8zyeg3dxyLk0Ru3vokZDTk-zlmTFV0TTvFNofTLkGVwvKFcm8IrFOlqUf_VZr1pypxadJHG7pMaMPgUqhHzNo/s200/Carte_Blanche_Jeffery_Deaver_James_Bond_continuation_novel_007_cover_US_Simon_and_Schuster_1st_American_Edition_first_dust_jacket.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5643077269426694258" /></a>Carte Blanche: 007<div>Jeffery Deaver</div><div>Simon and Schuster, 2011</div><div>
<br /></div><div>Since I now work for a publishing house, I want to start including books reviews and discussions on this blog as well as movie and theatre reviews. Those posts will continue for sure, but I'm also branching out and tackling fiction, non-fiction, comic books, and whatever else I get around to reading and writing about. First up, a recent release that I received while I was studying at NYU. I didn't get a chance to read it until the program ended, but I'm glad I made the time to sit on the couch, drink a beer, and read this new Bond novel. "Reboot" has become a dirty word when referring to recent films, but this is an excellent "reboot" of the literary James Bond.</div><div>
<br /></div><div>Things that worked perfectly:</div><div><ul><li><b>Echoes of Film Bond.</b> Deaver's story would fit perfectly into the list of James Bond films. The story takes Bond to exotic locations, involves three beautiful Bond women, a diabolical villain with a real-world plot, and a psychotic henchmen. Action sequences were drawn right from the second unit team, and even John Barry's scores were running through my head as I read them. In fact, Deaver draws so much from the film Bond tradition that he even includes the next bullet point.</li><li><b>A pre-title sequence! </b>The book actually starts focused on other characters, including the engineer of a locomotive through the countryside. We're introduced to Bond a few short chapters in, when he is involved in a shootout, the destruction of the aforementioned locomotive, and a car chase across the countryside. I could almost hear the title song kick up, and I loved it.</li><li><b>Echoes of Book Bond. </b>As much as Deaver connects to the cinematic Bond history, he also has his feet planted in Fleming's tradition as well. From the description of Bond's eyes and the lock of hair that falls over his eyes to Bond's occasional melancholy and genuine sadness, Deaver knows his Fleming history. It's great to see such a wonderful blend of the two elements of Bond's history.</li></ul></div><div>Things that worked out okay:</div><div><ul><li><b>Bond's new backstory.</b> Drawing on the backstory of the literary Bond, Deaver brings back the idea that Bond is an orphan whose parents were killed in a ski accident when he was a boy. I thought it was going to originally stay as backstory, but Deaver expands on it and starts creating an intrigue-laden story for Bond's parents that is more than Fleming ever intended. It is an interesting idea, and I like the attempt to make this more of a modern thriller than Fleming's books. It comes off as a little obvious, although Deaver does include a twist on it that makes it more interesting that just the cliche.</li><li><b>Pacing.</b> I love books with short chapters. I don't know why, but the chapters come across like popcorn and it's almost impossible to stop reading. Deaver uses this technique really well during the action scenes, but it's one of the those styles that can't help but call attention to itself. In short, it works really well, but there are small places where it feels forced.</li></ul></div><div>Things that didn't work so well:</div><div><ul><li><b>Nothing. </b>Literally, nothing. There are some pieces that don't work as well as others, but no element fell flat on its face. That surprised me, but my standards for books are much more flexible than for films.</li></ul><div>Overall:</div></div><div>
<br /></div><div>This is a very enjoyable book. I grew up watching the Bond films, and I read all of Ian Fleming's original novels. "Carte Blanche" is a great way to update the Bond series and bring 007 into the 21st century, and there are even rumors that this book might form the basis of the next Daniel Craig film. I'd be all about that, especially since this book is a lot better than <i>Quantum of Solace</i>. Ultimately, I was up late at night reading as much of the book as I could, and that is the best recommendation I can give it.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-81758867314603920142011-08-20T15:03:00.008-04:002011-08-20T16:55:51.508-04:00"Captain America: The First Avenger"<div style="text-align: left;">"Captain America"</div><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvLUl-dsTqQK3pH6ebOP-0dpB6EL_5lxnMVkGkgVXPxfQVUmp3h5H8ugTd1caIcS5Lb50fKg0Vbl8uGd9gV8MZsaKbtnhyKyvr9iS9vne6TQgt1vmwcOO8DGcon_WPcEO3S-o_B-S7E0g/s200/Captain-America-movie-poster-with-Chris-Evans.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5643038991162574850" style="float: right; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; cursor: pointer; width: 145px; height: 200px; " /><div><div>A review, in bullet-points
<br /><div style="text-align: right;">
<br /></div><div>Before I headed into the theatre, the only thing I knew about Captain America was that there would be trouble when Captain America throws his mighty shield. I didn't know exactly what that trouble was, but anyone who throws a shield at me is going to get me to yield rather quickly. I'm a little late to the party where this movie is concerned, but since it was directed by Joe Johnston, who also directed <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocketeer">The Rocketeer</a></i>, I was on board for some old-fashioned action adventure fun. And I didn't know how right I would be!</div><div>
<br /></div><div>Things I loved:</div><div><div><ul><li><b>The action.</b> The action sequences were amazing. They were realistic (for the most part), exciting, and seeing Cap throw his shield was worth the price of admission. The first sequence after he becomes the super soldier is incredible, and he's not even wearing the uniform yet.</li><li><b>Chris Evans.</b> I wasn't sure that Evans was a good choice for Cap, but he won me over almost immediately. I quickly forgot that I was watching the star of other films, and I only saw him as Captain America. The haircut and the overall styling helped a lot as well. The computer effects to make him smaller were mostly convincing, too, and although it sometimes looked like a strange bobblehead, it always <i>felt</i> like the same character.</li><li><b>The script.</b> For the most part, the pacing of this movie was dead-on. There was enough character development that made it clear why Steve becomes Captain America, and there were good comedy beats exactly where we needed them. And perhaps most importantly, there were no characters that existed only to be ciphers and provide backstory or plot development. Very well structured, very well written.</li><li><b>The old-fashioned style of film-making. </b>Aside from the visual effects, this film felt like it could have been made twenty-years ago. There is no shaky-cam, no lens-flare, no quick-cuts, all elements of modern cinema that drive me crazy. Instead, Johnston uses long tracking shots, wide pans, giving the film the feeling of a much older, more "classic" Hollywood. Not only does it mirror the 1940s setting, but it makes it that much more exciting for me.</li></ul></div></div><div>Things I liked less than I expected:</div><div><ul><li><b>The costume.</b> When the first few photos of the movie costume came out, I was really excited. I thought it was really cool. I liked how it combined the comic book design with the reality of WWII-era uniforms. But unfortunately, it didn't look as good in motion due to bizarrely padded shoulders and a strange helmet that didn't look as good as his USO look.</li><li><b>Hugo Weaving as Red Skull.</b> In the opening scenes of the movie, Weaving is understated, subtle, and truly creepy. But as the the film continues, not only does his performance become downright mustache-twirling, but his accent starts approaching "moose and squirrel" territory. Maybe it was the Halloween mask they made him wear.</li></ul></div><div>The less-would-have-been-more file:</div><div><ul><li><b>Montage, times two.</b> It's strange to see a montage in a film these days. And this movie has two of them. Both of them fit the story, do a good job of showing the passage of time, and contain a lot of exciting imagery. However, both of the montages were a little long and they robbed the film of some momentum.</li><li><b>The love story.</b> I don't know why every superhero movie needs to have a love story, especially when it feels tacked-on in movies like this, <i>Thor, Iron Man 2</i>, and <i>The Dark Knight</i>. It gives the opportunity for some jokes, some intentionally tender script moments, but overall it felt tacked-on by the marketing and publicity department.</li></ul></div><div>Things that seemed on-loan from another movie:</div><div><ul><li><b>The timeline</b>. Captain America is a hero from WWII. And according to the comic books, he somehow winds up in the present day, as a part of the team that includes Hulk and Iron Man. But the pieces of this story are thrown into this movie is such a strange way that I don't see how you could understand it unless you already knew the character's comic history. It felt like they should have saved it for <i>The Avengers</i> movie next summer.</li><li><b>Samuel L. Jackson.</b> I'm sorry, fans of Marvel Comics, The Avengers, and Mr. Jackson in general. He is completely out of place in these movies. He's there just for fan service, and when it comes to acting, he's not even trying. Reminds me of his comically awkward turns in the Star Wars prequels. This movie (and maybe the entire Marvel movie universe) would be better if they deleted Nick Fury and replaced him with the wonderful <a href="http://mimg.ugo.com/201005/43362/cuts/agent-coulson_288x288.jpg">Agent Coulson</a>.</li></ul><div>Overall:</div></div><div>
<br /></div><div>I loved this movie. Loved, loved, loved this movie. I wish that all movies were this good. Does it have some problems? Sure, of course it does. Almost every movie does. There are places where the film bogs down in the love story, or where the pace feels a little off. But if more movies were made like this, I would not complain.</div></div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-63218138483648084012011-08-01T21:56:00.001-04:002011-08-02T13:40:24.648-04:00Book GuiltNow that I am an aspiring professional in the publishing industry, I receive several newsletters discussing the state and future of the business. The recent issue of one of them contained a link to <a href="http://www.shelf-awareness.com/readers-issue.html?issue=13#m274">this story</a>, in which Bethanne Patrick discusses her recent guilt over vulturing the sale tables at Borders liquidation sales. I know that I'm guilty of this as well, as I've been wandering past those stores much too often looking to see if they've offered any new discounts since I was there two days ago. (Usually not.)<div><br /></div><div>Patrick questions how much we can possibly value books, if we are willing to do so much to avoid paying for them. I know I am also guilty of this little problem, choosing to purchase books online or in used condition rather than pay full-price for them. I have shelves and shelves of books that I bought a library book sale (3/$1) that I've never read, nor never plan to read. And so reading this article made me think about my own book-buying habits. Maybe I can take her advice and give up the latte to buy a trade paperback. I know I'll make the sacrifice necessary to pick up some comic books in September, so I'm sure magazines and new books are worth my money too. Once I have the income to spread around, I'm looking forward to using that money to support the things I enjoy. The hosts of the very entertaining movie podcast "<a href="http://www.betterinthedarksite.com/">Better in the Dark</a>" always encourage people to vote with their dollars, and I will do the same. As soon as I have some dollars.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-45176778550635731652011-07-27T21:56:00.000-04:002011-08-02T12:40:39.854-04:00A luxury item after all<div style="text-align: left;">Okay, so I <a href="http://scriptinhand.blogspot.com/2011/07/books-new-luxury-item.html">posted a few days ago</a> about the emergence of books as a new luxury item. I shared the fact that I grew up in a household that was covered in books. I literally have boxes and boxes of books in my childhood bedroom and my parent's attic, including a box each for Star Wars novels and Star Trek novels. My book collection has expanded over several bookshelves, and I never thought of books as luxury items. Sure, I would buy every book in certain series, and I always loved it when the series had a consistent design so that <a href="http://www.exodusbooks.com/details.aspx?id=6027">all the books look the same</a>. I have that borderline OCD that wants everything to fit together on my shelf. (I have a huge love/hate relationship with the snapcase vs keepcase issue in my DVD collection.)</div><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE7fB62koLB5CVvrWwsMWkErk_U_eEUpwVpc5NBbiy7IT8oj6q2NU9rghHPWsxM24fD68hl9QBtLJI6RuS2cLwK5rA1ALB-kVZTMS8yIL-bP4XQbvZy35UG-Wd4hSKa1kCRcnJnZDTEc8/s320/pile-of-books.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 230px; height: 230px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5631894387128115186" /><div>But now this post takes a left-hand turn; I might even backtrack over my old position. I just read <i><a href="http://www.jefferydeaver.com/Novels_/Carte_Blanche/carte_blanche.html">Carte Blanche</a></i> by Jeffery Deaver, the newest James Bond novel. I enjoyed it so much I wanted to backtrack and find a copy of the previous Bond novel, <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil_May_Care_(novel)">Devil May Care</a></i>. I had it in my head that I would go pick up a paperback copy of the book, but then I saw the hardcover for sale. And it looked like this:</div><div><div> </div><div><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXyYag_Wr2zOjuB7-_RijhTMvY88p7paXIts6ee0Zm7a0SM8IyzWznQc6jf47jeyCaNBRl_vnXL3mraZY6nd2H8jLR9oZwFREssb4r5WMxecDhstE-KuDG0tCLC7Kr570fnKNMbZk02cw/s320/devil-may-care_us.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 154px; height: 250px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5631905677672329554" /><div style="text-align: left;">Now, that is an attractive book design. And when I saw it, I appreciated the cover, the image, the logos, and even the way that the black-clad figure (presumably James Bond) wraps around the spine and continues onto the back cover. The back cover (not pictured) has a large quote from the novel, in which M welcomes 007 back to active duty. It's such an attractive book, especially with the dust jacket over the black book, and it will look great on the bookshelves. I specifically chose to buy the book in hardcover, so I guess that books might be a luxury item after all.</div></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div>Of course, since I'm still unemployed, I did not drop the money on this pretty hardcover.</div><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhNXBZBY1BT9SHTO56aOqB924nqWIt2AfVyG8BgJY82CBSeeSP5QbB1gvoiQfkXflbuqf7B0-zRghwJfQxe-vDVM4LtSq51gGOuvhJjlM-Le-ILZM7L3lvLryxcWp-JtMCNd3tjD10WcE/s320/kevin-anderson-enemies-allies.jpg" style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 213px; height: 320px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5634212499415129362" /><div>I'll wait for the paperback to show up on the sale shelf.</div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-55724705915271626122011-07-21T12:20:00.000-04:002011-08-02T12:40:39.854-04:00Books - The New Luxury ItemA recent guest speaker talked about the love of physical objects as it related to books. The printed, bound book is a work of art, and people like having them on their shelves. And this particular industry expert does not believe that print books are going to disappear anytime soon. In fact, no one is really expecting the printed book to completely vanish and be replaced by ebooks, but this speaker was very optimistic. "People will always want books," he said, "they are the next big luxury item."<div><br /><div>Um.....excuse me? Luxury item? .....books?</div><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjO3MWmaSrA9-m6om4QhsTwMIzF1Fmd27aTV0r9zOLmw95DxLQpQ3Y0ErbYoLB4DJEQX3pGtvZwCfn48d8Ux_NGc-2u5UXjbn0dxhrkrENE9k14Ey61-uwi-zhYyYx7_fvzoPOM44ojmi0/s320/8_big.jpg" style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 243px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5631877073968336018" /><div> Books!? I grew up in a house that has piles of books in every room. Even the kitchen was usually overrun by books that us kids were carrying around and leaving all over the place, usually leading my father to innocently pick them up and ask a series of questions instead of reading the cover copy. My parents were also one of the first people to jump on this new online retailer called Amazon.com, and we still have a magnet on our fridge that features the first logo for the online giant. So for someone who grew up surrounded by piles and piles of books of all different shapes, sizes, and colors, the idea of the book becoming a luxury item is a strange one. It's just as strange as thinking that <a href="http://publishingperspectives.com/2011/04/ebooks-mass-market-paperbacks/">the mass market paperback is doomed</a>, or that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303661904576454353768550280.html">Borders Bookstore is going to close forever</a>. But both of them are probably just as true, and I'm not entirely sure how I feel about it.</div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-5015195013921086472011-07-04T12:15:00.002-04:002011-08-02T12:27:32.132-04:00"X-Men: First Class"<div><b>X-Men: First Class</b></div><div>A review, done in bullet-points</div><div><br /></div>I'll confess - I'm not a huge fan of the X-Men comic book properties. My first real exposure to the mutants was with the first Bryan Singer film, and I moved outward from there, picking up the classic 90s animated series and some trade paperbacks which collected some of the major storylines. I was also a fan of the uncanny series written for a time by Joss Whedon, and I saw the rest of the films in the theatre. So I'm not as fully versed in the X-canon as I am with the Super-canon, so these comments will reflect that quote-unquote bias. I'm also not going to attempt to post a comprehensive review of the film. That territory has already been well-covered by <a href="http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/167405-x-men-first-class-review">Superhero Hype</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/jun/02/x-men-first-class-review">The Guardian</a>, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/x-men-first-class-movie-192965">The Hollywood Reporter</a>, <a href="http://www.pajiba.com/film_reviews/xmen-first-class-review.php">Pajiba.com</a>, and the <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2011/06/03/movies/x-men-first-class-review.html">New York Times</a>, and I don't really have the time to say all of their comments again. So instead I will focus my thoughts in convenient bullet point format and run quickly through some of my major thoughts on this film.<div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>What I loved: </div><div><ul><li><b>The design and style</b>. It was like a 1960s James Bond movie done with a budget and scale to rival modern blockbusters. It was a period piece, and they even replicated some of the filmmaking styles of the 60s. A training montage halfway through the film is amazing.</li><li><b>Professor X and Magneto</b>. James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender steal the show. They are great together, and they steal the scenes they are in. Fassbender has a little more to do and a much broader arc, but both of them knock it out of the park. </li><li><b>Flight effects</b>. As a Superman-fan, I am a sharp critic of flying on film. I never think it looks realistic. But the scenes of Banshee <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Hw4Fmifdzc">flying</a> in this movie are some of the best that have ever been done. Very realistic, yet without obvious use of computer generated imagery.</li><li><b>The scope, but without the "origin-sickness."</b> This one will take a second to explain. In many superhero franchises, the first film suffers from "origin sickness," taking a lot of time to develop and explain the backstory of the hero, showing the process by which the hero develops. But that often means that the first hour of the movie is dedicated to slow-moving development before the more interesting part begins. And First Class avoids that problem really well. I don't know if it's the genius of the screenwriting or the fact that the script banks on knowledge of previous X-films, but it works really well.</li></ul><div>What I didn't love as much:</div><div><ul><li><b>Emma Frost, and to some extent, Mystique.</b> This film continues the tradition of the X-men film franchise of having excellent leading men and adequate leading women. Much has already been written about January Jones, but even Jennifer Lawrence's Mystique isn't compelling. Maybe it's because the majority of her scenes </li><li><b>Comic book tropes</b>. The characters at one point come up with their own code names. Without missing a beat, they automatically pick the ones established by the comic books, including esoteric names like "Professor X." Where did that name come from, other than the fact that the comic books said so? When Hugh Jackman called him "Wheels" in the first movie, that felt authentic. These "code names" just felt forced.</li><li><b>Cameos.</b> Well, one cameo in particular that was set in a bar, featuring a certain mutant that we all know from the previous films. He was played by the same actor as the original films, and I know I am in the minority that this cameo actually took me out of the movie. It was distracting to see the original actor in the new franchise films. It would be like having Leonard Nimoy is a Star Trek movie featuring a brand-new crew. Oh wait...</li><li><b>Confusion over the next step.</b> Is this film a stand-alone prequel, or is it the first step in another trilogy to link up with the original film? If it was the first, then things weren't complex enough for me to jump over the 35-year-gap to get to the next film. Aside from the main characters aging, it seems like it should happen tomorrow. But if we're being set up for a sequel, then things were wrapped up a little too neatly </li></ul></div><div><div>Overall:</div><div><br /></div><div>This is one of the best superhero films I've ever seen. Despite having some problems here and there with continuity, it makes me want to see another one. Now I'm just hoping that Captain America is that good.</div><div><br /></div></div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-23728374987149046932011-06-24T19:24:00.004-04:002011-06-26T17:20:07.601-04:00The Big Day!So last Friday was the big day! Eight hours of presentations while all ten groups gave not-so-brief overviews of their magazine proposals, including cover, content, business model, advertising plans, website, facebook, twitter feed, etc. And these are all projects that we put together in only three weeks. Wowzers. A lot of them were very strong overall, and there were some elements of specific pitches that were really genius. But there could be only three winners (apparently), and my magazine was unfortunately not among them. We were told by the judges that they loved our funny content, but they couldn't see how we were going to make any money through advertising. "Perhaps," they suggested, "this would be a great product to launch as a stand-alone book." (Ironic, considering the next section of the course is one labeled - "book publishing.") But this time around, it was all about magazines, so we were sorta forced by the definition of the course to work on a magazine. <div><br /></div><div>However, I am very excited to get to the book section. Book publishing has been my main focus and interest since I first thought of this career change, so I'm looking forward to meeting the people for this second section. Also, I've been assigned the role of publisher for our next set of group projects, which I think is going to be an excellent thing to talk about in my future cover letters for job applications. The publisher is essentially the book company's executive producer, in charge of making sure that all of the teams work together and all the pieces come together in the end. I'm also pretty sure that the publisher is the major spokesperson for the brand, so I think I'll be doing a lot of presenting in front of people. I'll have to balance this project workload with the job hunting and networking that I need to do while I'm here, in order to stay in NYC after the program is over.</div><div><br /></div><div>But putting aside anything like that, and on a material-for-future-posts note, I'm seeing<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrbHykKUfTM"> X-Men: First Class</a> tonight. A review will follow in the next few days.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-86110783931924897312011-06-23T23:11:00.002-04:002011-06-23T23:48:37.603-04:00(The Night Before) The Big DayIt's hard to believe that I've been here for three weeks already. Three weeks of lectures, classes, stress, homework, and projects. And I feel a little behind the eight-ball that I've only applied for two jobs, but the book section is coming up next, and I'm ready to dive into that one full-tilt. These first three magazine weeks have been a warm-up for the program that I'm really interested in, and it makes me wonder what the curriculum is like at the <a href="http://www.du.edu/publishinginstitute/index.html">University of Denver</a>. I have actually really enjoyed working on this pseudo-magazine launch, and after our project got the green light for launch at the end of the first week, it has been an interesting ride. <div><br /></div><div>For the launch, I worked as the advertising sales director, which meant that I was in charge of figuring out how we were going to get companies to buy advertisements in our magazine. We're doing a magazine that makes it a little hard for those sorts of things, but we came up with some good angles and some good sales pitches, and I feel confident about my part in the magazine. And even more than that, I'm really excited about our overall product. We had some amazingly talented people working on this project, and I am literally awed by some of their talent. </div><div><br /></div><div>Anyway, we present our work to the panel of judges tomorrow, and they will be evaluating our project based on the reports we turn in and our answers to their questions. There are prizes given out, awards to be issued, but I don't think that any of them come with big cash advances or job offers. Sadly. But I will try to post another entry tomorrow after the presentation day and before I go to see "X-Men: First Class" this weekend. And you better believe that I'll be blogging about that one!</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-3984973545091552192011-06-20T20:20:00.003-04:002011-06-20T21:05:47.706-04:00Week Two, although a little lateThis posting comes in a few days late, as we ended our second week of classes up here last week. And during a media talk last week, essentially a big networking event for the students to meet as many industry professionals as we could, one of our industry advisers made a comment that filled me both with hope and anxiety. He said that every one of us will have a job within a year, maybe a year and a half. But the challenge is to find the job that we will enjoy. That is the sort of thing that makes me feel a little better about what I'm doing right now. After all, he's the one who has been speaking to the program for six years, so he is in a good position to speak to the graduation rates. <div><br /></div><div>I go back and forth on how I feel about ending this program and entering the work force. Some days, I am completely psyched up and chomping at the bit to apply for jobs at book publishers and rock out the job as an editorial assistant. And on other days, I'm hit with waves of panic about being 30 and trying to break into a completely new industry where I have little experience and only very loose connections. And in moments like that, I wonder if I made a mistake by leaving my city and abandoning my career. When the panic from these moments subsides, I try to reexamine the decisions that led me to this point. Do I wish I could go back to my former life? In some ways, yes. But do I have faith that my new life is going to be more satisfying? In many ways, yes. And that faith is the scariest part, since I have no actual evidence that things will be any different on the other side of this program. All I can do is do the best I can, and have faith that things will work out in my favor. I try to maintain that confidence, and it is only in small ways that I lose that faith.</div><div><br /></div><div>So I remember to breathe, I listen to the music from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_The_Movie">Superman</a>, and I try to make the next day even more productive. I have faith, and I have confidence, and I'll bring them both forward with me. One step at a time.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-26562076523706437762011-06-13T19:08:00.002-04:002011-06-13T20:48:28.971-04:00Week OneOkay, so I know that I am a few days to really make this one even seem to be "on time," but this last weekend marked the end of my first week in New York City at NYU. And I do apologize for that. Lots of exciting, terrible, and frustrating things have been going on, but one thing is for sure: it's been one heck of a busy week. Monday and Tuesday were easily 13 hour days, and I felt as if I wasn't going to have any time for anything other than class, work, and sleep. But after the crazy schedules calmed down a bit (and we got our final project approved by our course administrator), those days shortened to only 11 hours and we managed to find time to enjoy the city and find some drinking spots near our dorm. And we found a lot of drinking spots. <div><br /></div><div>Our typical day involves getting down to our school building around 8:30 or 9am, and then we sit in panel discussions and hear lecture presentations until 5pm. Then we are expected to work in our 10-person groups on our group project, preparing to launch a new magazine upon the unsuspecting world. We went through about a dozen ideas before one of them was approved by our instructor, and we were sorta at our wit's end when it came to ideas. A half-assed joke turned into a full-fledged idea, and now we're working out way through the business plan and the advertising strategy for a bi-monthly magazine. We've been challenged so far by the assignments, and our judges for the presentations have been a whole slew of industry professionals. We've met some people who are literally rock stars in their profession, and they have been very willing to "open their brains" to us and give us all the advice that we can ask for. It's been a lot of fun to work on this project, but it has also been a lot of work.</div><div><br /></div><div>In the coming weeks, I'll try to keep the postings up-to-date. I'll also try to get some New York photos to share with those playing along at home. They are keeping us quite busy here; so much so that even when we have a night with nothing due the next day, we're all sitting at our computers wondering if there is something else we are supposed to be doing. It's a sickness.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-67188335204258268242011-05-31T18:21:00.001-04:002011-05-31T22:34:02.152-04:00Looking and Moving Forward, but Peeking BackA week from now, I will be finished with two days of class at NYU. I'm working on my pre-program research assignments (i.e. homework) right now, wishing I had started writing these answers two weeks ago. But until <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doc_Brown">Doc Brown</a> comes through, it's impossible to change the past. But unfortunately, our brains are only set up to look into the past. We haven't yet mastered the art of looking into future, and, as you all know, my name is not Ms. Cleo.<div><br /></div><div>I am very excited about many aspects of going to NYU. I know that I can pull my weight in an academic setting, I'm excited to live in New York City fox six weeks*, and I am excited to take a bold first step on a new journey in my life. The idea of this career change is also an exciting on, as I was not interested in my old career any longer. When it came to acting, I was slacking off too much and not taking steps to ensure my own success; I was setting myself </div><div><br /></div><div>But there are many aspects about going to NYU that scare me, or at least fill me with apprehension. For the first time since 2003 at Hedgerow Theatre, I will actually be living in the same room as another student.** I'm a tough cookie who can handle anything for six weeks, but this is certainly a wrinkle in the plan. Then of course, I have to finish my homework before the course starts, and it's lack-of-completion freaks me out. (I have no right to complain; I'm the one who has been putting it off.) I'm also concerned that I will spend a lot of money for this education, and then I won't be able to find a job in the field. That at the end of this experience I will be right back where I am now, temping at a series of disappointing jobs. </div><div><br /></div><div>But I know I'm smarter than that.*** Even if the New York publishing job doesn't come through right as the program is complete, hopefully NYU or my temp agency will be able to help me find something satisfying as well as lucrative. My future after the program is perhaps the biggest source of anxiety for me; I'm very excited to see what is in the future come mid-July, but I'm also very worried that there won't be anything there at all. I need to stop, breathe, and have more confidence in myself. </div><div><br /></div><div>It is at times like this when I find myself falling into Doc Brown's white wig and lab coat, and trying not to wish about the job I didn't get in Philadelphia. I would like the stability, the money, the security, but I'm looking forward to working in NYC instead of Philly. I would really like to work in the big city, at DC Comics or elsewhere, and I'm reminding myself that the first step is often the scariest. Especially when you're not entirely sure where the road leads. </div><div><br /></div><div>But I've taken enough time writing this blog (i.e. avoiding my homework), so I'm going to finish my endnotes for this entry and then head back to work. Rest assured that you'll be hearing from an over-stressed me again this week.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>*- perhaps, and hopefully, much longer after completion of the program</div><div>** - the other program I applied for guaranteed single-occupancy rooms</div><div>**** - Statistically speaking...</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-2860161955947708772011-05-24T13:15:00.005-04:002011-05-24T13:15:00.935-04:00Irony. It can be pretty ironic sometimes.As I try to move into another career, I am still hooked into my old one. Most of my friends are actors (or at the very least directors and writers), so I'm still very much plugged into the performing world. As a result, I am still on the books for my agent, and I've had a crazy amount of auditions in the last few weeks. Sometimes I would go for weeks or weeks without any auditions, and suddenly I found myself having more than one a week. Two friends have given me the names of their agents, or the casting director that just got them a great gig, and they told me to drop their names when I sent in my headshot. I, of course, hesitated and resisted for a few days before getting my acting materials in order and shipping them on their merry digital way.<div><div><br /></div><div>I know what you're thinking... "He's not quitting! I knew he couldn't stay away! I was right all along! Damn that Nick is sexy! He loves acting too much to leave!" And you are right, all of you. Especially random voice number four. But as a very good friend recently said, "I'm tired of acting for money that I need." If the acting becomes a sideline career, all for the best. And if I book so much full-time (i.e. full-pay) acting work that I just never get the chance to work for a publishing house, then that is the cross I am willing to bear. It would be ironic, though, if the success I've always looked for comes my way because of my retirement.</div><div><br /></div><div>Of course, I haven't booked any of my auditions, (although I came really close on one of them), so I'm not thinking of this as a sign from above. But at the moment, acting is one of the few things that I am legitimately qualified to do, and so it seems silly to turn my back on it completely. And if irony holds true, maybe I'll hold myself over as an actor until I find something new. That would be ironic, indeed.</div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-68725533834209685222011-05-22T17:56:00.000-04:002011-05-23T18:36:34.806-04:00My Mental IssuesThere is an expression about standing in the way of your own success. I'm sure that a little Internet searching can reveal a few more details about the specific quote I'm remembering, but the idea is one that isn't connected to one quotation alone. And while I do not exactly think that I am literally standing in the way of my own success, I do think that I have certain mental issues that make things much harder on myself than they need to be. I would like to drop some of these terrible habits. I think I would have a much happier life if could shut off my brain at certain moments and just relax more. But instead, I think far too much and don't take care of myself.<br /><br />Case in point:<br />I spent six weeks being considered for a job in the early part of this year. As I shared in a <a href="http://scriptinhand.blogspot.com/2011/02/disappointments.html">blog post</a> in February, I did not get the job. But I did spend those six weeks hoping and wishing for the job. I talked about what I would do in the job, and I even talked about the things I was doing in case I didn't get it. Of course, I did not do any of the things I had been planning to do, and so when the job offer did not come, I felt like I was left up the creek without a paddle. And the only person responsible was me, since I had willingly thrown the paddle into the river.<br /><br />Another case in point:<br />I am a well-educated, articulate person. I have a variety of work experience, with different interests that span disciplines, and I work very well both on my own and in a team. However, I am at heart a very insecure person. One moment is enough to throw my whole universe out of whack. One lost job that I thought was in the bank. One stray comment after a night of drinking. One facebook status change that seems to contain a hidden message, one rejected job application, one perfect plan that falls though last minute, and I'm suddenly a quivering mess of self-dout. One moment calls everything else into question, and I'm left grinding my jaw and developing ulcers.<br /><br />What I am doing:<br />Billboards everywhere are saying that "Self worth beats net worth." I have been trying to keep things in perspective, and I've been trying to remember that life is long and there are no checkpoints along the way. The only pressure on me is the pressure that I put on myself. To that end, I have been trying to put less pressure on myself. I often compare myself to other people, either in their career, their finance, their relationship, and I never think that I match up. I've been trying not to do that, but it's not easy to stop. So instead, I try to remember that other people compare themselves to me. Or that I can compare myself to others and come out on top.<br /><br />What I need to do:<br />Somehow, I need to figure out how to be much happier with myself. I have been talking about finding a new hobby tha I can put some time into, something solitary unlike radio production. I've been looking into things like yoga or tai chi, and I do know that my NYC dorm is outfitted with a gym. I plan to dedicate some time to the gym on a regular basis, trying to generate some healthy habits. Because as far as I can tell, worrying is not a healthy habit.Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-85908482628144513662011-05-21T23:53:00.001-04:002011-08-02T12:29:56.720-04:00The Averagely-but-not-Excessively Mighty ThorA week ago or so, I went to see "Thor" with a friend of mine. Unfortunately, we were unable to avoid the 3D screenings, so we ended up seeing the film through those crazy color-diluting sunglasses. I had been looking forward to seeing the film, although it only ranked third-of-four in the list of comic books movies I was excited about this summer. I was looking forward to Hemsworth's portrayal of Thor, and I thought that director Kenneth Branagh would handle the mystical elements well. Well, to make the long story short, I was right on both of those counts. However, it was the other elements in the film that didn't work for me. <div><br /></div><div>As Thor, Chris Hemsworth was right on the money. He had the swagger, the confidence, and the charm that the character needed. He played very well with all of the other actors, especially Anthony Hopkins as his father, and Hemsworth also had the massive physical presence that is required of an actor playing a Norse God. The sequences in the mythic realm were beautiful and epic, with the rainbow bridge from the comic mythology stealing the show. And what's even more important, I thought that Thor as a character fit very comfortably into his larger-than-life mythic realm. </div><div><br /></div><div>However, the sequences here on Earth seemed forced and/or phoned in. Natalie Portman plays a plucky scientist with a plucky assistant and a plucky advisor. And it's a good thing that she was working with people; otherwise she would have had no one to talk to in order to deliver exposition. After Thor is banished to Earth, loses his powers, and it taken down like a chump by S.H.I.E.L.D. agents (spoilers!), he spends approximately six minutes of screen time "learning" his lesson and going on the hero's journey. He comes back, says he loves Natalie Portman, which doesn't really seem all that likely.</div><div><br /></div><div>The other problem with the film involved the action sequences. A lot of them were blindingly blurry, incredibly quick, and I'm prepared to lay some of that at the foot of the the post-production 3D effects. But even without those 3D effects, the over-reliance on CGI landscapes and CGI cannon-fodder made the shots a little difficult to process. It's a running trend in films nowadays, but it is one that doesn't seem to be going away.</div><div><br /></div><div>Overall, I liked the film. Don't get me wrong. But it felt like a prequel to Thor's appearance in "The Avengers," much more than it felt like a film designed to start a Thor series. I'm not the biggest fan of the Marvel comic universe, but I like watching how their film universe is developing. I just wonder if they are putting the cart before the horse, though. These films need to stand on their own first, and encourage the overall universe second. If they only serve as prologues to the massive team-up film, then that puts an awful lot of eggs in one big-budget basket.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-79627986973864424962011-05-20T19:07:00.000-04:002011-08-02T12:41:13.405-04:00Look, Up in the Sky<div>It's a bird, it's a plane, it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman">Superman</a>! I'm sure I didn't have to finish that phrase. Just as I'm equally sure that I didn't have to hyperlink his name. If you don't recognize the name, then this blog post is not aimed at you. But what I do want to address, briefly, is one of the reasons that I love the Man of Steel - what he represents. Sure, I like his powers, his cape, the fact that he wears glasses in his secret identity. But in a much larger sense, Superman is the ultimate symbol of hope. And that's why I love him. He's not a hero because of a deep secret or because of a hidden trauma; he's a hero because it is literally the right thing to do. It's how his parents raised him, and he is a living example of what everyone could be if they chose to. </div><br /><div>To illustrate this point, I will share a recent moment on Smallville that really worked for me. It showed how the writers of the show really understand the character, and I have complete confidence in their season finale when Clark puts on the suit. The following exchange is between Clark Kent and his mother Martha, when Clark is wondering if he should reveal his face as a hero. </div><br /><div><em>Martha: What's real is your strength and integrity and compassion. As long as you remain honest to those things, it doesn't matter what you wear or what name you go by.</em></div><br /><div><em>Clark: So, you're saying I should become that hero and step into the light?</em></div><br /><div><em>Martha: Clark, you are the light.</em></div><br /><div></div><div>This exchange perfectly illustrates the true nature of Superman. He is not one standing at the head of the path, the man who has stepped into the light and allow others to line up behind him. He is the light in which all the others are bathed, and the other characters of the DC Universe </div><br /><div>There is a reason that Superman's intro starts with the hopeful phrase "Look, Up in the Sky!" We look up to him, we aspire to be like him, and we know that if we had powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men, we hope we would use them in the service of good. There is no reason for him to be a hero, and yet he is one. He does the right thing, simply because it is the right thing to do.</div><div><br /></div><div>Podcaster <a href="http://www.fortressofbaileytude.com/">Michael Bailey</a> expressed the opinion that Superman is like religion. You either understand him and you get him, or you don't; and if you don't understand the appeal of Superman, it can't be explained to you. And it is something that I completely understand. And not just because I wear glasses.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-10364803124769981042011-05-19T10:00:00.003-04:002011-08-02T12:28:07.868-04:00A Open Letter to Steven MoffatDear <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0595590/">Mr. Moffat</a>,<div><br /></div><div>First of all, let me say that I am huge fan. I love the episodes you wrote of <i>Doctor Who</i> with <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.currybet.net/images/doctor_who/2005_christopher-eccleston.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2009/03/currybets-law---5-reasons-why.php&usg=__liMGIb0pK5G5P6HQr9apPrpiWUA=&h=375&w=500&sz=49&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=onkeJvcQodLrnM:&tbnh=143&tbnw=211&ei=z47UTYCRNsyitgeq-_WNCA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dchristopher%2Beccleston%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D653%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=663&vpy=370&dur=703&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=132&ty=173&sqi=2&page=1&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:17,s:0">Christopher Eccleston</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01381/davidTennant_1381584c.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/doctor-who/5398444/Doctor-Who-David-Tennant-tipped-for-leading-role-in-film-spin-off.html&usg=__RRg4In9vYDl9FGOdSSHlSiqr3iU=&h=288&w=460&sz=50&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=1PPNhEJ0mLHCsM:&tbnh=121&tbnw=171&ei=8Y7UTYWOI8OBtgeY8P2WCA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Ddavid%2Btennant%2Bdoctor%2Bwho%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D653%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=955&vpy=371&dur=666&hovh=178&hovw=284&tx=143&ty=129&sqi=2&page=1&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:20,s:0">David Tennant</a>, and I am in awe of any writer who is responsible for both <i><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0237123/">Coupling</a></i> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0497298/"><i>Jekyll</i></a>. The differences between them astound me, each one brilliant in their own way, and my hat is off to you. Much has been made of the genius behind the episode "Blink," and I will throw my weight behind all of that praise. It's a beautiful scifi story, combining time travel, character moments, and some of the scariest villains ever created. I was very excited to learn that you had been put in charge of the new season of <i>Doctor Who</i>, and I enjoyed the season-long journey you took us on with <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://lh6.ggpht.com/_h4H6RxsFzhI/SV-qpot4MsI/AAAAAAAADAE/ecOvsTS-MZQ/%255BUNSET%255D.jpg&imgrefurl=http://tardisnewsroom.blogspot.com/2009/01/and-11th-doctor-is.html&usg=__NEMiTPqJFdiZXvL_za0WTi5UhsQ=&h=268&w=259&sz=24&hl=en&start=46&zoom=1&tbnid=jy__6JvQckGYVM:&tbnh=126&tbnw=123&ei=KpDUTe6ZMIKutwfMg-SPCA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dmatt%2Bsmith%2Bdoctor%2Bwho%2Btardis%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DX%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D653%26tbm%3Disch0%2C1047&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=531&vpy=218&dur=782&hovh=214&hovw=207&tx=124&ty=111&sqi=2&page=3&ndsp=29&ved=1t:429,r:10,s:46&biw=1280&bih=653">Matt Smith</a>. </div><div><br /></div><div>Today, I am writing to you because I just watched the episodes of your new BBC series, <i><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1475582/">Sherlock</a></i>. I am a huge fan of <a href="http://sherlockholmes.wikia.com/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes">Sherlock Holmes</a>, and it was with an equal mix of excitement and nervousness that I approached your new series. The idea of bringing Holmes into the modern age was one that I didn't completely agree with, but I was keeping my mind open to the possibilities. Also, I was willing to follow your name to the project. And you, sir, did not disappoint. The series is one of the best interpretations of the character that has ever been put on film, and Benedict Cumberbatch has the potential to be one of the iconic images of Sherlock. Martin Freeman's Watson is pitch-perfect, and your vision of Lestrade is quite possibly an improvement over Conan Doyle's. In short, the series is very strong, and I'm looking forward to season two.</div><div><br /></div><div>However, it would be remiss of me not to point out the one fault that I see developing in the series. In fact, it is now a running them in all of your writing. One might call it a variation on the Aaron Sorkin effect. In Sorkin's shows, all of his characters inevitably end up sounding the same. They speak in similar rhythms, similar styles, have similar styles of humor and similar levels of intelligence. This is not your problem, sir. Instead, you constantly have one single character (the Doctor, Jekyll, Sherlock) who is much smarter and speaks much faster than everyone else in the room. And that character sounds the same, no matter which series I'm watching. Sherlock Holmes should sound different than the Doctor, and they should both sound different than Mr. Hyde (no matter how hyper-intelligent he is.) This may seem like a very small detail in the face of the overwhelming awesome that are these shows, but the measure of genius is often in those small details. It's not the sort of thing that would make me stop watching either show, but it is the thing that reduces the originality of both programs. </div><div><br /></div><div>Also, and while not directly related to this matter, I would also like to take a moment to talk about cliffhangers. A good cliffhanger leaves the action in a tense beat, from which action can proceed in many directions, and we have to tune in next week(season) for the resolution. A good cliffhanger is not what happens that the end of Episode 3 of <i>Sherlock</i>. That was done so poorly, with such little regard for dramatic pacing, that I literally thought my DVR had missed the final act of the show. </div><div><br /></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div> Script in Hand</div><div><br /></div><div>ps. Who the f@&k is River Song? Seriously. The mystery is getting tedious. </div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-35618465130867777102011-05-18T12:51:00.002-04:002011-05-18T14:42:19.352-04:00The Strangest PlacesYesterday I worked another promo gig, handing out flyers and engaging prospective customers in aggressive yet friendly banter. I'm starting to learn that the defining characteristic of all these promo gigs is this - great money for a boring job. I was on my feet most of the pounding the proverbial pavement, eating my snacks from home and waiting for the quitting time. That time came soon enough, and a quick pizza dinner before the train trip home soothed my spirit for the time being. And the paycheck for a single day's work will also sooth my spirit.<div><br /></div><div>But this blog post isn't about the varied and unusual jobs that I've had to take as a working/struggling actor. Instead, it's just a brief comment about how I am looking forward to the day when I will only have one job instead of fifteen. Filing my taxes every year is an adventure in mathematics, as I have a lot of columns to add up from all the different jobs over the year. Now that I'm moving away from a career as a jobbing actor, I am more and more excited about the idea of working for a single company and getting a single W-2 at the end of the year. Working so many jobs is stressful, because I literally never know where my next paycheck is coming from. That was a fine way to live my life for a long time, but now I want something else. Something better. <div><br /></div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-88085188196865606452011-05-15T18:20:00.000-04:002011-05-16T21:28:40.644-04:00SERUM - Official trailerI'd like to invite you all to check out this trailer for a short film I was in last year. Actually, to be honest, I don't remember when I filmed this. I was an extra for a day, getting killed by the serial killer in the film. I mostly remember hanging around in the holding area, eating Papa John's pizza, and talking comic books with some of the other folks working on the movie. <div><br /></div><div>I also remember that the director was using an ipad (which was brand new at the time), to show the storyboards to the crew and the actors so we knew that the shots should look like. It was such a great way to incorporate the technology into filmmaking. </div><div><br /></div><div>In any case, enjoy the trailer for the short film. You can't see me in it. But watch it anyway.</div><div><div><br /><iframe width="400" height="257" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nXVAgQABxyA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div></div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-11890211316726123732011-05-12T17:07:00.000-04:002011-05-15T11:09:42.539-04:00A Taste of the Other SideIn my career as a temp, I've had some positions that have been easy, a few that have been interesting, but none that have required me to wear a full suit and interact with heads of finance companies. Until today, that is. I worked as the concierge/event support host for a financial symposium, interacting with directors and CEOs of companies that specialize in retirement investing and 401(k) accounts. The dress code for the job was my formal suit, and I spent all morning with people who were dressed just as well as I. There were about 40-50 execs in the room for financial presentations, all learning about new regulations, new strategies, and new tools in the financial game. The amounts of money and income they were discussing for "hypothetical clients" was in the low-to-mid six figures, and those were the "small-business" owners.<div><br /></div><div>A year ago, I would have looked around at the group of people assembled in this room and been glad that I was an actor. I would have liked the freedom, the possibility, and I would have seen all of the execs as being strangled by their expensive neckties. But how strange to see how things have changed in a year. I now wanted to be a part of this group, make a salary (plus benefits), and have a corporate job where I get to attend symposiums and seminars. </div><div><br /></div><div>Plus, it doesn't hurt that I came home with three or four days worth of leftovers, including delicious desserts. I love the temp jobs that come with perks.</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7389597000123530269.post-35280867504101281732011-05-11T19:49:00.001-04:002011-08-02T12:28:58.117-04:00An Open Letter to DC ComicsDear DC Comics,<div><br /></div><div>I have been reading comic books since I was 7 years old, picking up some of the John Byrne Superman issues when they came out in the mid-1980s. And to quote Bibbo, Superman was always my fav'rit. I was never much of a collector as a kid, even though I picked up the odd issue here and there when the covers interested me. Oh, sure, I was there for the death of Superman and his marriage to Lois Lane, but I tuned out a lot on the individual issues as I went to high school, college, and the work force. But even though I didn't follow the comics, I have always been a fan of the characters in the DC Universe, from Superman to The Spectre, Batman to Booster Gold. I followed them through the various animated adventures, feature films, and even the paperback books that were released over the last decade.</div><div><br /></div><div>But please understand that I love comic books. I like the way the story-telling them employ, I like the unique marriage of words and art, I like the feel of holding them in my hand, and I like the cliff-hanger based pacing within the larger context of world-building and long-running subplots. A single splash page from Action Comics capture my imagination for over twenty years before I could find the issue that continued the story. The issues were exciting, each one feeding into the ones before it, and the title marched forward with one continuing story.</div><div><br /></div><div>However, this brings me to my problems with the way you present your comic book titles. In the last five years, I've tried to jump onto the DC Superman titles a total of three times. I waited for major events to finish/end/disappear, and then I started picking up the Superman titles. I like the crossover between <i>Superman</i> and <i>Action Comics</i>, and I'm willing to purchase both titles to follow the story. But within mere months of me re-joining the comic-book-buying community, <u>another</u> major event came along that required me to buy tie-in titles, a miniseries, as well as other crossover titles just to get the full story that started (and sometimes ends) in <i>Superman. </i>I don't have the money or the patience to collect half a dozen titles just to get a single story.</div><div><br /></div><div>And so, DC Comics, in order to get this comic book reader back to the monthly schedule, please lay off the major crossover storylines that take place across multiple books. At least two years. If I have a story that runs through only the <i>Superman</i> title, or only in <i>Action Comics</i>, then I am far more likely to become invested in the larger universe and follow multiple characters. The Black Ring storyline in <i>Action</i> was a great start, but it's been undermined by the entire <i>Doomsday</i> story that I have no interest in. Following Superman from book-to-book is not a burden I am willing to take up. One title, one story. </div><div><br /></div><div>I enjoy the stories. I enjoy comic books. But I no longer buy them. I want to. I <i>really</i> want to find a monthly book that I can pick up, purchase, and love. So the burden is on you to give me something I <i>want</i> to buy. And I promise, I'll be there when you do.</div><div><br /></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div>Script in Hand</div>Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312361579169075316noreply@blogger.com1